A Game Called World
Domination
Is Global Politics Merely an
Illusion?
By Dale Cox
6-10-04
This topic usually comes up in regards to a James Bond movie. Elitist
individuals bent on controlling the world, using either a super weapon
to hold
the world hostage, or a monopoly of some product to hold the world
hostage.
We have all seen this scenario many times before, and every time the
lone
hero
comes to our rescue and the super villain meets a nasty demise. But
that's
usually in the realm of fiction. Realistically it is not the way life
usually
works in our world. All throughout our history, dictators have
frequently taken
control over us and wrought great violence and suffering before they
meet a
nasty demise, sometimes. Mostly their allowed to retire comfortably
under the silent protection of the global elite, being one of their
own. No lone heroes have come to our rescue. It
took the
tortured majority of us to rise up and through more violence drag down
these
men of evil. Only to have other well meaning evil men rise up in their
place.
As George Orwell would put it in his novel 1984, it is the natural
order of
things. It represents a concept that always sees culture being guided
by
individuals rather than the social group in general. One question we
should
ask, is, if Orwell could map the course of humanity in even a fictional
sense,
could not “others” map it in a geopolitical sense? If the pattern is
recorded
throughout written history, couldn't someone who's studied human
nature, merely
invent a ruse that would continue to look like human history? The point
Orwell
made was that the poor class will always live and fuel the constant
turnover of
geopolitical leadership from the middle to upper classes, then back
around to
the middle-class again. What if someone figured out that if you
controlled
government, media, and finance, you could manipulate what people
perceive as
reality, culture as we say, and eliminate in a real sense the turnover
between
middle and upper classes. While culturally maintaining the ruse that
this
process was still in charge and responsible for all change and conflict
in the
world. When in truth the change and conflict would be the result of the
manipulations expressed by a small group of people, solely for their
profit and
control.
So how would they do this? Simply by manipulating culture!
Culture is the
living software of human expression and endeavor. You can program a
culture much
in the same way you program an individual. The culture then becomes the
feedback source
of education for the individual. In order to observe the tendencies and
effects
of culture on the individual we can use what's referred to as cultural
symptomology. We can use a simple model with which to describe cultural
symptomology.
That model is ourselves. All endeavor that originates from humanity is
applicable to this model. As with the beginning of life in the womb in
the
germination process, all human endeavor begins this germination process
within
the human imagination. Then singularly or with a group, the idea is
born into
the light of day, like when we leave the womb. Then like a child,
depending on
how it is nourished, the idea grows. The idea, like a child, will meet
the
surrounding world it is birthed into, and be affected by it. If it is a
child
raised in oppression, it will experience a negative result proportional
to
the
inner strength and resolve of the soul or souls involved. Deviation
should not
immediately be judged as negative, as its negative or positive
expression is
proportional to the strength and inclination of the souls or soul
involved. We
also live under the Law of Karma. Some things that appear to be bad,
happen for good reasons, and vice versa. Thus, even within the midst of
a contrived culture, our individual lives are dictated as much by a
destiny orignating beyond our realm of control, as they are by the
effects of other people.
The child/idea continues to
grow
through adolescence,
into young adulthood, eventually gaining a purpose of its own. All
aspects of
human culture began as an idea within the human imagination. Of course
realistically we should not limit the origination of our imagination to
being a
concept
localized in the human body. We are not a phenomena limited to
the human body. Thus we can sense that spiritually, the process of
germination
before birth takes on the element of a mystery. Human consciousness
develops in relation to the environment it is nurtured in. As you look
at yourself
or the
people around you, you can see we all develop consciousness by creating
concepts
that either make us happy or sad depending on their result within our
actions.
Actions speak louder than words. In childhood we are shaped by culture
directly, the culture of our parents. Later when we grow into
adulthood, we are shaped by the culture of our peers. Few of us
actually engage a path that seeks to effect culture. It is only those
people who seek to change culture that realize how solid a structure it
is. This is why cultural symptomology is useful
in the
investigation of historical truth. We can observe cause and effect.
Look at the confluence of issues within your own psyche that
creates your
daily disposition on the world. You can witness the same process at
work within
culture, within organizations, that creates the cultural disposition we
call everyday life.
The question becomes, who created the confluence of issues you're
reacting to, or that the world is currently reacting to.
If you can fool the man, then hypothetically you can fool the
town via association to the man, and
eventually the nation via association to the town. Most of the ideas we
live with every day
originated in
the imagination of someone else a long time ago. Every King or Emperor
began as
a small boy. Every religion began with one man. Every nation was born
in the
imagination of one man, then spread virus like to his fellows. This is
why
history is an important topic to pay attention to. Cultural
symptomology gives us a tool from which
to view
our surroundings in relation to history. We can observe the change in
ideas,
but more importantly the results of those changing ideas in the world
around
us. We can observe where we have come from and the possibilities for
where we
can go. Our individual lives are the product of our choices. It is the
same for
the corporation, a race, a nation and planet. Our world is the sum of
our individual choices. This is why, after leaving the
individual level,
it becomes important for all of us to be aware of where we are being
led
historically. Of how our choices affect the world we live in.
Media is an instrumental tool in the daily posturing of our
consciousness. It
is the proverbial stage, and we are hypnotized by it like deer in
headlights. Both
conflict and consensus are created with media. In essence, media
becomes its
own justification. I can only know what's happening on the other side
of the
world in at least one of three ways. First, I go there personally, or
someone I
know and trust goes there personally and tells me, or I believe the
words or
images I receive via a media source. This renders most of what I know
based on
faith, as I haven't been alive very long in relation to all of recorded
history
and known knowledge. That said, one must then entertain what could be
defined
as a media concept. A lot of people would understandably limit their
notion of
media to what they see on a video screen, or what they listen to on the
radio,
or read in a magazine. Realistically we must also include all the
variety of
what we might call unconscious media. A good chess player adopts a
strategy
that seeks to keep his opponent in a defensive posture on the entire
board,
having to react rather
than
act. A really good chess player is able to turn the point of the sword,
with a
series of seemingly defensive moves, and put his offensive opponent on
the
defensive.
Media is the mosaic of our sensual experience on a day to day basis.
Sights,
sounds, smells, other peoples conversations we casually over hear in
passing,
music
without words, mechanical sounds, the perspectives of the people we
work with,
the presence of other people or their absence, our feelings, the
memories of
our past, our imaginative expectation of our future. We live in media
rich
consciousness. This is the chess board. Cultural symptomology, is the
analysis
of our opponents game.
In this light, there are several essays and events that our
culture has
been exposed to
over the past hundred years or so. More so recently, as media has taken
on an
ever increasing global aspect in the last fifty years. These essays are
hotly
debated as to their validity as fact or fiction. It is not the matter
of their
factual or fictional nature that I raise today. More so what they bring
to the
chessboard. If you look at culture as a mosaic of ideas laid out in
time, you
can begin to see the squares on the chessboard. A move is not made for
the
moment, it is made in the history of the game. Who owns the Media now,
how long has
control
over
the media remained under the control of any one specific agenda? We can
look at the
growing trend towards censorship within American media. Not all at
once, just a
slow consistent trend, until it gains momentum and changes culture and
free speech goes away.
Ending African
slavery, ending women's suffrage were ideas that had to grow through
time,
they peaked, became effective in making change, and have now become
part of
culture. In the same way the Captains of industry have been building
empires in
infrastructure, one company at a time throughout colonial history. To
where now shipping, raw
materials, railroads, oil, and
the most
important one banking, are all privately owned. Yet our every day lives
depend
on the products of these industries. This is why most people don't
suspect a conspiracy, because we grew up in it. A slave born into
captivity
has a different perspective on the definition of slavery, than the
person who
was not born a slave.
I have included the Council of Trent, and George Orwell mostly
as side notes in history. In each of the other essays, treaties and
meetings the key players are
presented
as people of power, seeking more power via the economic monopolization
of the
resources key to everyday life around the world. Economic power has
become greater
than military power because it can attack men's souls. The love of
money
corrupts! A man will murder for money. Governments have merely become
the secretaries to the wealthy
elite.
Acting as an illusionary source of proletariat control, the source of
the cultural
dramas
that effect our everyday lives.
"Governments do not govern, but merely control
the
machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden
hand."
-- Benjamin Disraeli
The
Council of Trent
1545
“The Council of Trent, the 19th
ecumenical council of the Roman Catholic church, was held at
“In the area of religious doctrine,
the council refused any concessions to the Protestants and, in the
process,
crystallized and codified Catholic dogma far more than ever before. It
directly
opposed Protestantism by reaffirming the existence of seven sacraments,
transubstantiation, purgatory, the necessity of the priesthood, and
justification by works as well as by faith. Clerical celibacy and
monasticism were
maintained, and decrees were issued in favor of the efficacy of relics,
indulgences, and the veneration of the Virgin Mary and the saints.
Tradition
was declared coequal to Scripture as a source of spiritual knowledge,
and the
sole right of the church to interpret the Bible was asserted.”
I bring this into the picture as an example
of how culture
was shaped in the past. Politically, you could say the council of
From September, 1814 to June, 1815, the
four powers of the allied coalition, winners of the Napoleonic Wars,
met at the Congress of Vienna, along with a large number of rulers and
officials representing smaller states. It was the biggest political
meeting in European history.
Shortly before Napoleon’s defeat at
Waterloo, negotiations at the Congress of Vienna were completed, and
the treaty was signed on June 9, 1815. The Russian czar saw through the
planned European Federation, recognizing it as an Illuminati ploy, and
would not go along with it. On September 26, 1815, the Treaty of Holy
Alliance(Treaty of Verona)
was signed by Alexander I of Russia, Francis II of Austria, Frederick
William III of Prussia, and Chateaubriand of France, while the allies
were negotiating the Second Peace of Paris. The Treaty guaranteed the
sovereignty of any monarch who would adhere to Christian principles in
the affairs of State. The Treaty made them a “true and indissoluble
brotherhood. Although the Alliance had no influence on matters,
it did indicate to other countries that they had banded together
against them, and it succeeded in temporarily crushing Europe’s growing
liberal movement.
After the Napoleonic Wars, the Illuminati
thought the world would be tired of fighting, and would accept any
solution to have peace. Through the Congress of Vienna (1814-15), the
Rothschilds hoped to create a sort of League of Nations. In actuality,
the reason for the Congress of Vienna, was for the Illuminati to create
a Federation, so they would have complete political control over most
of the civilized world. Many of the European governments were in debt
to the Rothschilds, so they figured they could use that as a bargaining
tool. The Illuminati, in their first attempt, had come terrifyingly
close to gaining control of the world. The head of the family, Nathan
Rothschild, awaited the day that his family would get revenge by
destroying the Czar and his family, which they did in 1917..”
Treaty of Verona 1822
Extract from the
1916 Congressional
Record Senate
Senator Owen: I wish to put in the Record the secret treaty of
Indeed,
here is a good point to observe the rule of the few versus the rule of
the
many. That natural trend George Orwell describes in his “book within a
book” in
1984 which comes along in 1949. At this time it must be noted, that the
enemy
of the monarchy was not the approach of the trend towards self
government by
the masses, which was what the Monarchy believed. It was the
Industrialist
Banker who was already in the process of stealing everything the
Monarchy
owned. Capitalism was the real enemy. Since the beginning of the 1700’s
the
Monarchy's of
General
Albert Pike's Plan
1871
Albert Pike was a 33rd degree Mason, he was Grand Master of a Luciferian group called the Order of the Palladium, he was one of the founders of the Ku Klux Klan, and it's first Grand Dragon. In the 19th Century Albert Pike established a framework for bringing about the One World Order. Based on a vision revealed to him by Lucifer in a dream he had. Albert Pike wrote a blueprint of events that would play themselves out in the 20th century, with some of these events yet to come. It is this blueprint which unseen leaders are following today, knowingly or not, to engineer the planned Third and Final World War.
Pike's plan was ingeniously
simple. The inherent antagonism between
different ideologies was to be stirred up and made to explode in three
world wars and three revolutions. The first world war was to destroy
the three European empires, at that time being the last remaining
bulwarks against Illuminism. One of these (Russia) Was to be made a
centre of atheist totalitarianism (Communism). The second world war was
to erupt from heightened tensions between the Jewish race (and its
spiteful Zionism) and extreme European nationalism (Nazism and
Fascism). This war would weaken Europe economically and politically and
Communism would expand and become as strong as all Christendom, but not
stronger, until the time was up for the final destruction of society. A
third reason the second world war was to create a Jewish state in
Palestine. Gradually it would be possible to thereby heighten the
tensions between Judaism and Islam until tbey broke out in a war which
would bring in all of the world powers. The three revolutions, which
would aid this carefully planned dissolution of all human civilisation,
were the Russian, the Chinese and Indo-Chinese. (Des Griffin, "Descent
Into Slavery'" South Pasadena 1984, pp. 38-39.) The reader will
realise. that most of this evil plan already become reality. Concerning
the last stage, General Pike wrote following:
'We shall unleash the Nihilists and
Atheists and provoke a
formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly
to nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of
the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to
defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will
exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude,
disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that
moment on without compass (direction), anxious for an ideal, but
without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true
light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of
Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view, a manifestation which
will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow
destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and
exterminated at the same time.'
Albert Pike is a good example of the sort of men who consider
world domination an adequate life's goal. His type are the architects
and collaborators passing the dark torch of oppression down through
time. Intelligent, but arrogant, they want to leave a mark on history.
Albert Pike has monuments to his credit. Of course his input into our
culture was of an extremely dark occult nature. The end of the 1800's
saw many such individuals, steeped in the occult, littered throughout
high governmental positions both in Europe and America. These people do
epitomize the enemy that seeks to possess humanity.
The
Protocols
of the Elders of Zion
1897
“Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of
introduction. The book in which they are embodied was first published
in the
year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate
friends. The first time Nilus published them was in 1901 in a book
called The Great Within the Small
and reprinted in
1905. A copy of this is in the
“Political freedom is an idea but not a
fact. This idea
one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait
of an
idea to attract the masses of the people to one's party for the purpose
of
crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier of
the opponent
has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, SO-CALLED
LIBERALISM, and,
for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is
precisely
here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of
government
are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by
a new
hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day
exist
without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of
the old
already weakened by liberalism.”
To put it simply,
the Protocols of the Elders exposes us to the racial reality that is
Zionism
today. However, we must not let our vision be obscured by decorum. We
must not
judge Judaism as Zionism. For all the children of Abraham are caught up
in a
viscous
battle for their very salvation. Zionism seeks to
destroy the
Jews for providing a vessel for the Christ to incarnate in. It
hopes to destroy Judaism if not from within by
compromising it's
mission for the Christ, then from without by making Israel the enemy of
all other peoples on the planet. This plan is potentially furthered by
global elitists in the Balfour
Agreement which leads us off into a different thread that does
eventually weave its way back into this story. But we'll get to that
another day.
In
the Fall of
1910, a railroad car owned by the then Senator Nelson W. Aldrich of
This
was the roster of the Aldrich car
that night:
1. Nelson W.
Aldrich, Republican
"whip" in the Senate, Chairman of the National Monetary Commission,
business
associate of J.P. Morgan, father-in-law to John D. Rockefeller, Jr.;
2. Abraham
Piatt Andrew, Assistant
Secretary of the
3. Frank A.
Vanderlip, president of the
National City Bank of New York, the most powerful of the banks at that
time,
representing William Rockefeller and the international investment
banking house
of Kuhn, Loeb & Company;
4. Henry P.
Davison, senior partner of the
J.P. Morgan Company;
5. Charles D.
Norton, president of J.P.
Morgan's First National Bank of
6. Benjamin
Strong, head of J.P. Morgan's
Bankers Trust Company; and
7. Paul M. Warburg, a partner
in Kuhn,
Loeb & Company, a representative of the Rothschild banking dynasty
in
England and France, and brother to Max Warburg who was head of the
Warburg
banking consortium in Germany and the Netherlands.
In 1913, the
year that the Federal
Reserve Act became law, a subcommittee of the House Committee on
Currency and
Banking, under the chairmanship of Arsene Pujo of
1984 George
Orwell
1949
The
Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism
Although in and of itself, the life of Eric
Arthur Blair, or
as we know him, George Orwell, isn't significant in any way. It does
not
attract attention as being the life of someone who would willfully
participate
in the psychological manipulations of the masses. And yet “1984”, and
his other
acclaimed book “Animal Farm” speak of man with deep insight into our
archetypal
natures. “Animal Farm” gives us graphic images as to the hidden
spiritual natures
within people. While “1984” is a profound prediction of an Ahrimanic
future
rapidly descending upon western culture, specifically in
“1984 has long
been the first book to which we have
turned for a vivid picture of a government that has used war to justify
infringement on freedom; that has used speech codes to limit everyone's
ability
to understand higher concepts or concepts that favour human
individuality; that
uses powerful media to build unwarranted consensus and rewrite history;
and
that has used technology to nip political opposition and
individualistic or
eccentric practices in the bud. Far from being a caricature, it
insightfully
and skillfully characterizes the tendencies and motivations of
unlimited
government power, and the horrifying, hopeless result of such
government:
humanity denied its freedom to think, to be rational, and to
dissent...its
freedom to be human.”
Report From
Commission Conclusions and Assumptions:
Lasting
peace, while not theoretically impossible, is probably unattainable.
Even if it could be achieved it would almost certainly not be in the
best interests of a stable society to achieve it.
War fulfills certain functions essential
to the stability of our society. Until other systems of filling them
are developed, the war system must be maintained.
Poverty is necessary and desirable.
Standing armies are, among other things,
social-welfare institutions in exactly the same sense as are
old-people's homes and mental hospitals.
The space program and the anti-missile
missile and fallout shelter programs are understood to have the
spending of vast sums of money as their principal goals, not the
advancement of science or national defense.
Military draft policies are only remotely
concerned with defense.
Some proposals that were seriously considered:
Organized repression of minority groups
Reestablishment of slavery
Deliberate intensification of air and water
pollution (part of a program leading to
peace)
The idea of a real peace in the world,
general disarnment and so on, was looked on as utopian. Or even
crackpot.
Some proposals that were seriously considered:
Conclusion: