A Game Called World Domination

Is Global Politics Merely an Illusion?
By Dale Cox

This topic usually comes up in regards to a James Bond movie. Elitist individuals bent on controlling the world, using either a super weapon to hold the world hostage, or a monopoly of some product to hold the world hostage. We have all seen this scenario many times before, and every time the lone hero comes to our rescue and the super villain meets a nasty demise. But that's usually in the realm of fiction. Realistically it is not the way life usually works in our world. All throughout our history, dictators have frequently taken control over us and wrought great violence and suffering before they meet a nasty demise, sometimes. Mostly their allowed to retire comfortably under the silent protection of the global elite, being one of their own. No lone heroes have come to our rescue. It took the tortured majority of us to rise up and through more violence drag down these men of evil. Only to have other well meaning evil men rise up in their place. As George Orwell would put it in his novel 1984, it is the natural order of things. It represents a concept that always sees culture being guided by individuals rather than the social group in general. One question we should ask, is, if Orwell could map the course of humanity in even a fictional sense, could not “others” map it in a geopolitical sense? If the pattern is recorded throughout written history, couldn't someone who's studied human nature, merely invent a ruse that would continue to look like human history? The point Orwell made was that the poor class will always live and fuel the constant turnover of geopolitical leadership from the middle to upper classes, then back around to the middle-class again. What if someone figured out that if you controlled government, media, and finance, you could manipulate what people perceive as reality, culture as we say, and eliminate in a real sense the turnover between middle and upper classes. While culturally maintaining the ruse that this process was still in charge and responsible for all change and conflict in the world. When in truth the change and conflict would be the result of the manipulations expressed by a small group of people, solely for their profit and control.

So how would they do this? Simply by manipulating culture! Culture is the living software of human expression and endeavor. You can program a culture much in the same way you program an individual. The culture then becomes the feedback source of education for the individual. In order to observe the tendencies and effects of culture on the individual we can use what's referred to as cultural symptomology. We can use a simple model with which to describe cultural symptomology. That model is ourselves. All endeavor that originates from humanity is applicable to this model. As with the beginning of life in the womb in the germination process, all human endeavor begins this germination process within the human imagination. Then singularly or with a group, the idea is born into the light of day, like when we leave the womb. Then like a child, depending on how it is nourished, the idea grows. The idea, like a child, will meet the surrounding world it is birthed into, and be affected by it. If it is a child raised in oppression, it will experience a negative result proportional to the inner strength and resolve of the soul or souls involved. Deviation should not immediately be judged as negative, as its negative or positive expression is proportional to the strength and inclination of the souls or soul involved. We also live under the Law of Karma. Some things that appear to be bad, happen for good reasons, and vice versa. Thus, even within the midst of a contrived culture, our individual lives are dictated as much by a destiny orignating beyond our realm of control, as they are by the effects of other people.

The child/idea continues to grow through adolescence, into young adulthood, eventually gaining a purpose of its own. All aspects of human culture began as an idea within the human imagination. Of course realistically we should not limit the origination of our imagination to being a concept localized in the human body. We are not a phenomena  limited to the human body. Thus we can sense that spiritually, the process of germination before birth takes on the element of a mystery. Human consciousness develops in relation to the environment it is nurtured in. As you look at yourself or the people around you, you can see we all develop consciousness by creating concepts that either make us happy or sad depending on their result within our actions. Actions speak louder than words. In childhood we are shaped by culture directly, the culture of our parents. Later when we grow into adulthood, we are shaped by the culture of our peers. Few of us actually engage a path that seeks to effect culture. It is only those people who seek to change culture that realize how solid a structure it is. This is why cultural symptomology is useful in the investigation of historical truth. We can observe cause and effect. Look at the confluence of issues within your own psyche that creates your daily disposition on the world. You can witness the same process at work within culture, within organizations, that creates the cultural disposition we call everyday life. The question becomes, who created the confluence of issues you're reacting to, or that the world is currently reacting to.

If you can fool the man, then hypothetically you can fool the town via association to the man, and eventually the nation via association to the town. Most of the ideas we live with every day originated in the imagination of someone else a long time ago. Every King or Emperor began as a small boy. Every religion began with one man. Every nation was born in the imagination of one man, then spread virus like to his fellows. This is why history is an important topic to pay attention to. Cultural symptomology gives us a tool from which to view our surroundings in relation to history. We can observe the change in ideas, but more importantly the results of those changing ideas in the world around us. We can observe where we have come from and the possibilities for where we can go. Our individual lives are the product of our choices. It is the same for the corporation, a race, a nation and planet. Our world is the sum of our individual choices. This is why, after leaving the individual level, it becomes important for all of us to be aware of where we are being led historically.  Of how our choices affect the world we live in.

Media is an instrumental tool in the daily posturing of our consciousness. It is the proverbial stage, and we are hypnotized by it like deer in headlights. Both conflict and consensus are created with media. In essence, media becomes its own justification. I can only know what's happening on the other side of the world in at least one of three ways. First, I go there personally, or someone I know and trust goes there personally and tells me, or I believe the words or images I receive via a media source. This renders most of what I know based on faith, as I haven't been alive very long in relation to all of recorded history and known knowledge. That said, one must then entertain what could be defined as a media concept. A lot of people would understandably limit their notion of media to what they see on a video screen, or what they listen to on the radio, or read in a magazine. Realistically we must also include all the variety of what we might call unconscious media. A good chess player adopts a strategy that seeks to keep his opponent in a defensive posture on the entire board, having to react rather than act. A really good chess player is able to turn the point of the sword, with a series of seemingly defensive moves, and put his offensive opponent on the defensive. Media is the mosaic of our sensual experience on a day to day basis. Sights, sounds, smells, other peoples conversations we casually over hear in passing, music without words, mechanical sounds, the perspectives of the people we work with, the presence of other people or their absence, our feelings, the memories of our past, our imaginative expectation of our future. We live in media rich consciousness. This is the chess board. Cultural symptomology, is the analysis of our opponents game.

In this light, there are several essays and events that our culture has been exposed to over the past hundred years or so. More so recently, as media has taken on an ever increasing global aspect in the last fifty years. These essays are hotly debated as to their validity as fact or fiction. It is not the matter of their factual or fictional nature that I raise today. More so what they bring to the chessboard. If you look at culture as a mosaic of ideas laid out in time, you can begin to see the squares on the chessboard. A move is not made for the moment, it is made in the history of the game. Who owns the Media now, how long has control over the media remained under the control of any one specific agenda? We can look at the growing trend towards censorship within American media. Not all at once, just a slow consistent trend, until it gains momentum and changes culture and free speech goes away. Ending African slavery, ending women's suffrage were ideas that had to grow through time, they peaked, became effective in making change, and have now become part of culture. In the same way the Captains of industry have been building empires in infrastructure, one company at a time throughout colonial history. To where now shipping, raw materials, railroads, oil, and the most important one banking, are all privately owned. Yet our every day lives depend on the products of these industries. This is why most people don't suspect a conspiracy, because we grew up in it. A slave born into captivity has a different perspective on the definition of slavery, than the person who was not born a slave.

I have included the Council of Trent, and George Orwell mostly as side notes in history. In each of the other essays, treaties and meetings the key players are presented as people of power, seeking more power via the economic monopolization of the resources key to everyday life around the world. Economic power has become greater than military power because it can attack men's souls. The love of money corrupts! A man will murder for money. Governments have merely become the secretaries to the wealthy elite. Acting as an illusionary source of proletariat control, the source of the cultural dramas that effect our everyday lives.

"Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand." -- Benjamin Disraeli


The Council of Trent                            1545

“The Council of Trent, the 19th ecumenical council of the Roman Catholic church, was held at Trent in northern Italy between 1545 and 1563. It marked a major turning point in the efforts of the Catholic church to respond to the challenge of the Protestant Reformation and formed a key part of the Counter-Reformation. The need for such a council had long been perceived by certain church leaders, but initial attempts to organize it were opposed by Francis I of France, who feared it would strengthen Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, and by the popes themselves, who feared a revival of Conciliarism. The council eventually met during three separate periods (1545-47, 1551-52, 1562-63) under the leadership of three different popes (Paul III, Julius III, Pius IV). All of its decrees were formally confirmed by Pope Pius IV in 1564. “

“In the area of religious doctrine, the council refused any concessions to the Protestants and, in the process, crystallized and codified Catholic dogma far more than ever before. It directly opposed Protestantism by reaffirming the existence of seven sacraments, transubstantiation, purgatory, the necessity of the priesthood, and justification by works as well as by faith. Clerical celibacy and monasticism were maintained, and decrees were issued in favor of the efficacy of relics, indulgences, and the veneration of the Virgin Mary and the saints. Tradition was declared coequal to Scripture as a source of spiritual knowledge, and the sole right of the church to interpret the Bible was asserted.”

I bring this into the picture as an example of how culture was shaped in the past. Politically, you could say the council of Trent was a damage control opportunity on the part of the Church, to redirect the momentum of the Reformation after Martin Luther's death. He died in February of 1546, months after he started a process that would be dragged out for eight more years. The Reformation made significant changes in the social structure of Europe, effecting millions of people, as did the Church's response to the Reformation with the Council of Trent. Pawn dies, Knight advances! The geopolitical manipulations of the Catholic Church have had a very direct effect on the formulation of the western culture that we live in today.

The Congress of Vienna                     1814

From September, 1814 to June, 1815, the four powers of the allied coalition, winners of the Napoleonic Wars, met at the Congress of Vienna, along with a large number of rulers and officials representing smaller states. It was the biggest political meeting in European history. The main concern of the Congress was to redistribute conquered territories, create a balance of power, restore the pre-Napoleonic order through King Louis XVIII, return the power to families who were ruling in 1789, and to return the Roman Catholic Church to its former power.

Shortly before Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo, negotiations at the Congress of Vienna were completed, and the treaty was signed on June 9, 1815. The Russian czar saw through the planned European Federation, recognizing it as an Illuminati ploy, and would not go along with it. On September 26, 1815, the Treaty of Holy Alliance(Treaty of Verona) was signed by Alexander I of Russia, Francis II of Austria, Frederick William III of Prussia, and Chateaubriand of France, while the allies were negotiating the Second Peace of Paris. The Treaty guaranteed the sovereignty of any monarch who would adhere to Christian principles in the affairs of State. The Treaty made them a “true and indissoluble brotherhood. Although the Alliance had no influence on matters, it did indicate to other countries that they had banded together against them, and it succeeded in temporarily crushing Europe’s growing liberal movement.

After the Napoleonic Wars, the Illuminati thought the world would be tired of fighting, and would accept any solution to have peace. Through the Congress of Vienna (1814-15), the Rothschilds hoped to create a sort of League of Nations. In actuality, the reason for the Congress of Vienna, was for the Illuminati to create a Federation, so they would have complete political control over most of the civilized world. Many of the European governments were in debt to the Rothschilds, so they figured they could use that as a bargaining tool. The Illuminati, in their first attempt, had come terrifyingly close to gaining control of the world. The head of the family, Nathan Rothschild, awaited the day that his family would get revenge by destroying the Czar and his family, which they did in 1917..

The late 1700's and the beginning of the 1800's saw the beginning of the shift away from medival fuedalism in the monarchy sense, to the new capitolistic fuedalism. The royalty was replaced by the banker. The period between the Congress of Vienna and the Council of Verona witnessed this changing dynamic. The rise of the Bnakers had begun.

Treaty of Verona                                  1822    

Extract from the 1916 Congressional Record Senate

Senator Owen: I wish to put in the Record the secret treaty of Verona of November 22, 1822, showing what this ancient conflict is between the rule of the few and the rule of the many. I wish to call the attention of the Senate to this treaty because it is the threat of this treaty which was the basis of the Monroe doctrine. It throws a powerful white light upon the conflict between monarchical government and government by the people. The Holy Alliance under the influence of Metternich, the Premier of Austria, in 1822, issued this remarkable secret document:

Indeed, here is a good point to observe the rule of the few versus the rule of the many. That natural trend George Orwell describes in his “book within a book” in 1984 which comes along in 1949. At this time it must be noted, that the enemy of the monarchy was not the approach of the trend towards self government by the masses, which was what the Monarchy believed. It was the Industrialist Banker who was already in the process of stealing everything the Monarchy owned. Capitalism was the real enemy. Since the beginning of the 1700’s the Monarchy's of Europe had been disappearing in conflict, while the International Banker had been brazenly taking his place. The International Banker was the new Monarchy. Capitalism was the realization of the whole chess board. At this time European colonialism was having its heyday, which reaped plunder aplenty for private investors. The money followed the cancerous spread that was the Western capitalistic tendency. The Monarchy's that adapted survived, the rest perished.

General Albert Pike's Plan                1871

Albert Pike was a 33rd degree Mason, he was Grand Master of a Luciferian group called the Order of the Palladium, he was one of the founders of the Ku Klux Klan, and it's first Grand Dragon. In the 19th Century Albert Pike established a framework for bringing about the One World Order.  Based on a vision revealed to him by Lucifer in a dream he had. Albert Pike wrote a blueprint of events that would play themselves out in the 20th century, with some of these events yet to come.  It is this blueprint which unseen leaders are following today, knowingly or not, to engineer the planned Third and Final World War.

Pike's plan was ingeniously simple. The inherent antagonism between different ideologies was to be stirred up and made to explode in three world wars and three revolutions. The first world war was to destroy the three European empires, at that time being the last remaining bulwarks against Illuminism. One of these (Russia) Was to be made a centre of atheist totalitarianism (Communism). The second world war was to erupt from heightened tensions between the Jewish race (and its spiteful Zionism) and extreme European nationalism (Nazism and Fascism). This war would weaken Europe economically and politically and Communism would expand and become as strong as all Christendom, but not stronger, until the time was up for the final destruction of society. A third reason the second world war was to create a Jewish state in Palestine. Gradually it would be possible to thereby heighten the tensions between Judaism and Islam until tbey broke out in a war which would bring in all of the world powers. The three revolutions, which would aid this carefully planned dissolution of all human civilisation, were the Russian, the Chinese and Indo-Chinese. (Des Griffin, "Descent Into Slavery'" South Pasadena 1984, pp. 38-39.) The reader will realise. that most of this evil plan already become reality. Concerning the last stage, General Pike wrote following:

'We shall unleash the Nihilists and Atheists and provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment on without compass (direction), anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.'

Albert Pike is a good example of the sort of men who consider world domination an adequate life's goal. His type are the architects and collaborators passing the dark torch of oppression down through time. Intelligent, but arrogant, they want to leave a mark on history. Albert Pike has monuments to his credit. Of course his input into our culture was of an extremely dark occult nature. The end of the 1800's saw many such individuals, steeped in the occult, littered throughout high governmental positions both in Europe and America. These people do epitomize the enemy that seeks to possess humanity.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion       1897


“Of the Protocols  themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was first published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate friends. The first time Nilus published them was in 1901 in a book called The Great Within the Small and reprinted in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception, August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Soviet land was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner's of being shot on sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.”

“Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier of the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, SO-CALLED LIBERALISM, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism.”

To put it simply, the Protocols of the Elders exposes us to the racial reality that is Zionism today. However, we must not let our vision be obscured by decorum. We must not judge Judaism as Zionism. For all the children of Abraham are caught up in a viscous battle for their very salvation. Zionism seeks to destroy the Jews for providing a vessel for the Christ to incarnate in. It hopes to destroy Judaism if not from within by compromising it's mission for the Christ, then from without by making Israel the enemy of all other peoples on the planet. This plan is potentially furthered by global elitists in the Balfour Agreement which leads us off into a different thread that does eventually weave its way back into this story. But we'll get to that another day.

Meeting at Jekyl Island                           1910

In the Fall of 1910, a railroad car owned by the then Senator Nelson W. Aldrich of Rhode Island whisked six guests to a secret meeting at a private resort off the Georgia coast in the Sea Islands called Jekyll Island. This island was owned by J.P. Morgan. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the create of a privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.

This was the roster of the Aldrich car that night:

1. Nelson W. Aldrich, Republican "whip" in the Senate, Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, business associate of J.P. Morgan, father-in-law to John D. Rockefeller, Jr.;

2. Abraham Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the United States Treasury;

3. Frank A. Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York, the most powerful of the banks at that time, representing William Rockefeller and the international investment banking house of Kuhn, Loeb & Company;

4. Henry P. Davison, senior partner of the J.P. Morgan Company;

5. Charles D. Norton, president of J.P. Morgan's First National Bank of New York;

6. Benjamin Strong, head of J.P. Morgan's Bankers Trust Company; and

7. Paul M. Warburg, a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Company, a representative of the Rothschild banking dynasty in England and France, and brother to Max Warburg who was head of the Warburg banking consortium in Germany and the Netherlands.

In 1913, the year that the Federal Reserve Act became law, a subcommittee of the House Committee on Currency and Banking, under the chairmanship of Arsene Pujo of Louisiana, completed its investigation into the concentration of financial power in the United States.

 “Your committee is satisfied from the proofs submitted ... that there is an established and well defined identity and community of interest between a few leaders of finance ... which has resulted in great and rapidly growing concentration of the control of money and credit in the hands of these few men....”

 “When we consider, also, in this connection that into these reservoirs of money and credit there flow a large part of the reserves of the banks of the country, that they are also the agents and correspondents of the out-of-town banks in the loaning of their surplus funds in the only public money market of the country, and that a small group of men and their partners and associates have now further strengthened their hold upon the resources of these institutions by acquiring large stock holdings therein, by representation on their boards and through valuable patronage, we begin to realize something of the extent to which this practical and effective domination and control over our greatest financial, railroad and industrial corporations has developed, largely within the past five years, and that it is fraught with peril to the welfare of the country.”

 Such was the nature of the wealth and power represented by those seven men who gathered in secret.


1984 George Orwell                              1949

The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism

Although in and of itself, the life of Eric Arthur Blair, or as we know him, George Orwell, isn't significant in any way. It does not attract attention as being the life of someone who would willfully participate in the psychological manipulations of the masses. And yet “1984”, and his other acclaimed book “Animal Farm” speak of man with deep insight into our archetypal natures. “Animal Farm” gives us graphic images as to the hidden spiritual natures within people. While “1984” is a profound prediction of an Ahrimanic future rapidly descending upon western culture, specifically in America. It is for that reason that this book requires inclusion in our study today. Because it does so precisely describe our rapidly approaching future, and as your imagination expands to the scope of the conspiracy, you learn not to limit ideas merely because of decorum. His “book within a Book’ By Emmanuel Goldstein, The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism, is his fictional description of a global dynamic imposed via three main influences. The concepts of Hyper-Nationalism, complete economic control, and complete media control. To be sure, the name of the author being Jewish should not be regarded as accident, as most of the documents presented above have a Jewish connection of some sort.

“1984 has long been the first book to which we have turned for a vivid picture of a government that has used war to justify infringement on freedom; that has used speech codes to limit everyone's ability to understand higher concepts or concepts that favour human individuality; that uses powerful media to build unwarranted consensus and rewrite history; and that has used technology to nip political opposition and individualistic or eccentric practices in the bud. Far from being a caricature, it insightfully and skillfully characterizes the tendencies and motivations of unlimited government power, and the horrifying, hopeless result of such government: humanity denied its freedom to think, to be rational, and to dissent...its freedom to be human.”


Report From Iron Mountain                  1966

Commission Conclusions and Assumptions:

  • Lasting peace, while not theoretically impossible, is probably unattainable. Even if it could be achieved it would almost certainly not be in the best interests of a stable society to achieve it.
  • War fulfills certain functions essential to the stability of our society. Until other systems of filling them are developed, the war system must be maintained.
  • Poverty is necessary and desirable.
  • Standing armies are, among other things, social-welfare institutions in exactly the same sense as are old-people's homes and mental hospitals.
  • The space program and the anti-missile missile and fallout shelter programs are understood to have the spending of vast sums of money as their principal goals, not the advancement of science or national defense.
  • Military draft policies are only remotely concerned with defense.

    Some proposals that were seriously considered:

  • Organized repression of minority groups
  • Reestablishment of slavery
  • Deliberate intensification of air and water pollution (part of a program leading to peace)
  • The idea of a real peace in the world, general disarnment and so on, was looked on as utopian. Or even crackpot.

  • Conclusion:

    The most interesting note to make concerning these documents is the volume of the counter arguments that define them as fiction. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the meeting that took place at Jekyll Island, and the report from Iron Mountain, are all hotly debated as being fiction. Indeed they very well could be. The main point of this essay was to point to the perpensity within western culture for World Domination to be a topic of discussion among the wealthy elite. These people do already control 95% of the worlds wealth, there had to be a process whereby we have arrived at that reality. While in the mainstream media the notion of conspiracy only happens within the context of the enemy. Never in Dick Cheney's office. This is the attitude displayed to us by Justice Scallia recently in regards to his duck hunting trip with the Vice President, and his position of residing over the court case involving Mr. Cheney's private dealings with the big energy bosses. He wanted us to believe it was preposterous to consider he had conspired with the Vice President. Yet, they play their high stakes game of Mafia style warfare in front of our faces every day. This is how effective mind control has become in America. All the media does is wave its hand and repeat the spell for this situation, "these are not the druids you are looking for", and the average American seems to turn obediently away, to forever view the topic as purely fictional. Sooner or later you will notice that Toto has pulled back the curtain revealing the Wizard working the controls of human destiny. He stands there obediently barking in warning. The Wizard ignore him because he knows his magic is strong, and the majority of the masses are mesmerized by his show. He knows his tactic of dumbing down the masses has in most eliminated any possibility that they will connect him with the show they are watching. All they see is green, the shining glimmering green of the Emerald City.