A Brief Comment
on the Assassination
of John F. Kennedy!
7-23-1999
In seeking to take
the first
stumbling footsteps of the starving political writer, I must of course
make a comment on the assassination of John F. Kennedy. I have read
about
as much as the next guy. And I've seen Oliver Stone's "JFK". I've also
seen the McGruder film, many times. So here goes.
1. The assassination of
our
President is a matter that is personal to every American. Henceforth,
"NO"
information on the case should have been "TOO" secret for the American
public to see.
2. The ensuing
assassination
of the so called "Assassin", obviously precluded to a more involved
plot.
Especially when it was done right after he said "I am just a patsy".
3. After which
assassination
the secondary assassin proceeded to remain silent on the issue, until
his
death from cancer.
4. If after this series
of
events the officials we appointed to investigate the assassination
withdrew
the evidence from public sight. We can only conclude that contrary to
the
statement that the case was closed, the case had been purposely closed
to protect the guilty. Because, if the case was closed, the Warren
Report
should have been made public, as the issue had been settled.
5. Which meant that
since the
evidence was not due to be publicly released for another 50 years or
so.
That not only were the people responsible powerful people within our
own
society, but they were powerful enough to compromise our legal system
to
hide their crime.
6. Conclusion: It is
obvious,
by witness of the events of the last thirty years or so. that not only
did the perpetrators of this crime keep the evidence in secret, but
that
they were able to maintain the power to do so up until today. With the
flavor of a good old Roman intrigue, the wolves do lurk, and we would
be
foolish to not beware.
Top
|